Product Owner CRACK

When staffing your next agile project make sure you have the right Product Owner on board.
In their book Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed Barry Boehm and Richard Turner coined the acronym CRACK which describes the properties of a good Product Owner.

Collaborative: Works well with development team and stakeholders. Is present within the team.
Representative: Has a good understanding of the product vision and is able to represent the stakeholder.
Authorized: Is empowered to make decision.
Committed: Shares the development team and stakeholder goals.
Knowledgeable: Understands and is experienced in the specific domain to guide the project to success

Keeping those rules in mind can help you to find the right person for the Product Owner role.

Turn contracts into documentation

In part one I’ve shown how to turn contracts into code. In this part I am going to show how to turn contracts into documentation.

Using the contract as a model for both code generation and documentation can save a lot of time. That is because the contract represents a single source of truth, which can be used by developers and business people alike. Just like you would probably do when you design BPMN models together with people from business you can design service contracts in the same way. Designing service contracts together with business people fosters the notion of services as business assets rather than just technical artefacts. Beside the time savings this creates mutual understanding amongst developers and business people. It facilitates collaboration and aligns business and IT. It work especially well in agile contexts in which business and IT work closely together.

But in order to be able to generate proper documentation from XML schema it is necessary to document the schema very thoroughly. Luckily there is a standardized way to do that using <xs:annotation> and <xs:documentation>. The following listing shows how to do it right.


<xs:element name="PerformSimpleCalculationRequest">
  <xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Performs a simple calculation</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
  <xs:complexType>
    <xs:sequence>
      <xs:element name="operation" type="tns:Operation" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
        <xs:annotation>
          <xs:documentation xml:lang="EN">Operation to perform</xs:documentation>
          <xs:documentation xml:lang="DE">Operation zur Ausführung</xs:documentation>
        </xs:annotation>
      </xs:element>
      ...
    </xs:sequence>
  </xs:complexType>
</xs:element>

You can see the full listing in the previous blog post.
It is best practice to document every aspect in the schema in a way that can be understood by humans. Ideally not only by technicans but by business people as well. To achive that it is essential to use the right language from the respective business domain. As shown in the listing it is even possible to add documentation in multiple languages.

As XML schema itself is XML we can easily validate and transform it to HTML using XSD and XSLT. A template can be found as part of the example project.

The stylesheet can be linked to the XSD using the directive <?xml-stylesheet type=”text/xsl” href=”contract.xsl”?> within the XSD. If you open the XSD in a web browser it will be transformed right away and show the HTML output.

Alternatively you can transform the XSD on the commandline using msxsl.exe. Just type the following to generate the HTML documentation.

msxsl calculator.xsd contract.xsl -o calculator.html

Another option is to automate the transformation process using the Maven plugin org.codehaus.mojo:xml-maven-plugin as you can see in the following excerpt from the POM file.

<plugin>
	<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
	<artifactId>xml-maven-plugin</artifactId>
	<version>1.0</version>
  <inherited>false</inherited>
  <executions>
		<execution>
			<id>transform</id>
			<goals>
				<goal>transform</goal>
			</goals>
			<phase>install</phase>
		</execution>
	</executions>
	<configuration>
		<transformationSets>
			<transformationSet>
				<dir>api/src/main/resources/xsd</dir>
				<stylesheet>${project.basedir}/repo/transform/xsl/contract.xsl</stylesheet>
				<outputDir>target/repository</outputDir>
				<fileMappers>
					<fileMapper implementation="org.codehaus.plexus.components.io.filemappers.RegExpFileMapper">
						<pattern>^(.*)\.xsd$</pattern>
						<replacement>contract.html</replacement>
					</fileMapper>
				</fileMappers>
			</transformationSet>
		</transformationSets>
	</configuration>
</plugin>

The result is a HTML contract documentation in the target/repository directory. This documentation can for instance be uploaded to a Wiki which serves as a service repository. It is lightweight, easy to use and highly recommended as it greatly helps to increase the likelyness of service reuse.

It is definitely recommended to develop service contracts in workshops with people from IT and business. The person who moderates such a workshop can be called a BizDev, as he/she needs understanding of the business domain and technology alike. Doing that can greatly reduce misconceptions and create awareness of services as reusable business assets. Give it a try!

Turn contracts into code

Interfaces are one of the most important parts in software design. Designing software around properly defined interfaces has many benefits for instance in the areas of consistency, maintainability and reuse. A well written contract describes precisely how software artefacts (or services) interact with each other. Approaches such as Sustainable Service Design or the BiPRO standards rely on contracts based on XML Schema (xsd). As they start with the contract design, they are called contract or schema first approaches.
Once you have a contract the question is how to turn it into code. In the Java world JAXB is the first choice. Lets’s see how we can generate Java sourcecode from the schema.

We start with a simple schema shown in the following listing.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="contract.xsl"?>
<xs:schema
    xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"    
    xmlns:service="http://www.pleus.net/services"
    xmlns:tns="http://www.pleus.net/services/calculator/api/model"
	targetNamespace="http://www.pleus.net/services/calculator/api/model"
	elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="qualified"
	version="1.0">
	  
    <!-- ################################################### -->
	<!-- ################### Messages ###################### -->
    <!-- ################################################### -->

    
	<xs:element name="PerformSimpleCalculationRequest">
		<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Performs a simple calculation</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
		<xs:complexType>
			<xs:sequence>
				<xs:element name="operation" type="tns:Operation" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
					<xs:annotation>
                        <xs:documentation xml:lang="EN">Operation to perform</xs:documentation>
                        <xs:documentation xml:lang="DE">Operation zur Ausführung</xs:documentation>
                    </xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
				<xs:element name="value-a" type="tns:decimal9F2" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
					<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>First value</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
				<xs:element name="value-b" type="xs:decimal" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
					<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Second value</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
			</xs:sequence>
		</xs:complexType>
	</xs:element>
    
	<xs:element name="PerformSimpleCalculationResponse">
		<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Result of a simple calculation</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
		<xs:complexType>
			<xs:sequence>
				<xs:element name="result" type="xs:decimal" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
					<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Result</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
			</xs:sequence>
		</xs:complexType>
	</xs:element>
    

   <xs:element name="CalculatorError">
   	  <xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Provides error information</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
      <xs:complexType>
         <xs:sequence>
				<xs:element name="message" type="xs:string" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
					<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Fehlermeldung</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
				<xs:element name="code" type="xs:int" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
					<xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Fehlercode</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
         </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
   </xs:element>
	
    <!-- ################################################### -->
    <!-- ################# Type definitions ################ -->
    <!-- ################################################### -->

	<!--  Enum type  -->
	 <xs:simpleType name="Operation">
	    <xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Defines the arithmetic operations</xs:documentation></xs:annotation>
		<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
			<xs:enumeration value="ADD"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Add</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:enumeration>
			<xs:enumeration value="SUBTRACT"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Substract</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:enumeration>
			<xs:enumeration value="MULTIPLY"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Multiply</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:enumeration>
			<xs:enumeration value="DIVIDE"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation>Divide</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:enumeration>
		</xs:restriction>
	</xs:simpleType>

        <xs:simpleType name="decimal9F2">
          <xs:restriction base="xs:decimal">
            <xs:totalDigits value="9"/>
            <xs:fractionDigits value="2"/>
          </xs:restriction>
        </xs:simpleType>

</xs:schema>

The schema is part of an example project which can be downloaded here.

A more appealing representation would look as follows:

In order to turn this schema into code we can call the xjb tool which is part of the Java SDK on the command line like this:

xjc calculator.xsd

As a result we get Java code that we can incorporate in our code base. Another option is to generate the Java code from our Maven build. This can be achieved by adding following Maven Plugin to your pom.


<plugin>
	<groupId>org.jvnet.jaxb2.maven2</groupId>
	<artifactId>maven-jaxb2-plugin</artifactId>
	<version>0.8.1</version>
	<executions>
		<execution>
			<goals>
				<goal>generate</goal>
			</goals>
		</execution>
	</executions>
	<configuration>
		<schemaDirectory>${project.basedir}/src/main/resources/xsd</schemaDirectory>
		<bindingDirectory>${project.basedir}/src/main/resources/xsd</bindingDirectory>  
                <generatePackage>net.pleus.services.calculator.api.model</generatePackage>
	</configuration>
</plugin>

As a result we get basic Java classes that represent the messages and types defined in our schema. If you want to affect the way the code is generated you can provide xjb binding files to customize the generated code. If you want for example use java.util.Calendar to be generated for an xsd:date type you can use the following binding:


<jaxb:bindings version="2.1"
    xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
    xmlns:xjc="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb/xjc"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <jaxb:globalBindings generateElementProperty="false">
      <jaxb:javaType name="java.util.Calendar" xmlType="xsd:date"  
             parseMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.parseDate"  
             printMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.printDate">
      </jaxb:javaType>  
    </jaxb:globalBindings>   
</jaxb:bindings> 

Just drop the file jaxbbinding.xjb in the the same directory as your xsd file.

The foundation
We now have a simple Java class without any additional features:

JAXB comes with very useful plugins to pimp our generated code.

HashCode, equals, toString
If we want standard operations such as hashCode, equals or toString we can use the plugin org.jvnet.jaxb2_commons:jaxb2-basics.

This gives us:

Value Constructor
If we want value constructors, we can use the plugin org.jvnet.jaxb2_commons:jaxb2-value-constructor.

The result is:

Fluent APIs
Fluent APIs can be generated with the plugin net.java.dev.jaxb2-commons:jaxb-fluent-api.

This gives us a very nice fluent API to produce intuitive and readable code.

Bean Validation
One great aspect of schema first design is that one can nicely define types and constraints like tns:decimal9F2 shown in the listing at the top of this page. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could check those constraints in our code without additional effort? The plugin com.github.krasa:krasa-jaxb-tools generates JSR349 compliant bean validation annotations from our XSD types. After running the build we get annotated classes shown below for valueA which appears in the xsd as tns:decimal9F2:


@NotNull
@Digits(integer = 7, fraction = 2)
protected BigDecimal valueA;

To trigger the validation from your code we just need the following code snippet:


import javax.validation.*;

ValidatorFactory validatorFactory = Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory();
Set<ConstraintViolation<PerformSimpleCalculationRequest>> violations = validatorFactory.getValidator().validate(request);
for(ConstraintViolation<PerformSimpleCalculationRequest> violation : violations){
  System.out.println("Violation: " + violation);
}

Javadoc
And finally it would be nice to have the documentation from within the XSD file in the generated Java code as well.
This can be achieved by the org.dpytel.jaxb:xjc-javadoc plugin.

If you have additional needs to manipulate the generated code, you can implement your own JAXB plugin which can be hooked into the build process. This gives you maximum flexibility and full control of the code generation.

The entire plugin configuration is shown here:



	org.jvnet.jaxb2.maven2
	maven-jaxb2-plugin
	0.8.1
	
		
			
				generate
			
		
	
	
		true
		>net.pleus.services.calculator.api.model
		
			-Xinheritance
			-XtoString
			-XhashCode
			-Xequals
			-Xvalue-constructor
			-Xfluent-api
                        -XJsr303Annotations
		
		${project.basedir}/src/main/resources/xsd
		${project.basedir}/src/main/resources/xsd
		
			
				org.jvnet.jaxb2_commons
				jaxb2-basics
				${jaxb2-basics.version}
			
			
				org.jvnet.jaxb2_commons
				jaxb2-value-constructor
				${jaxb2-value-constructor.version}
			
			
				net.java.dev.jaxb2-commons
				jaxb-fluent-api
				${jaxb-fluent-api.version}
			
			
     				com.github.krasa
				krasa-jaxb-tools
				${krasa-jaxb-tools.version}
			
                        
		                org.dpytel.jaxb
  		                xjc-javadoc
		                ${xjc-javadoc-version}
		        
		
	


In this post I’ve shown how to turn contracts into code on the Java platform easily. The contracts are 100% reusable, interoperable and cross platform, of instance on the .NET platform. Here you would use svcuitl.exe to turn the contract into code.

In part two I’m going to show how to turn contracts in into documentation.

Free Visual XML Schema Designer

Those of you who utilize a contract first design such as in Sustainable Service Design have the need to edit XML Schema files frequently. If you are like me you are using a plain text or xml editor, as it gives you the greatest flexibility to express exactly what you want.
But sometimes it is great to have a visual representation. For instance when you discuss business related interfaces with people from the business. Eclipse is somewhat limited in this regard as it does not show the structures and types in context.

Visual Studio.NET comes with a great XML Schema designer which is part of the professional edition for a long time. Now Microsoft offers the Visual Studio.NET Community Edition which is a fully featured Visual Studio including the XML Schema designer for free.

Here you can see how it looks like:

It works even if the types are spread into several XSDs. And it shows the documentation. You don’t even need a Visual Studio project. Just drop the Schema into the IDE and off you go.

Sustainable Service Design

We all know the idea of sustainability from our daily life. But is it possible to apply this idea to software development? I think yes.
Sustainable Service Design is a practical approach to design and implement software services with a great level of reuse both at technical and business levels. It is based on the following four principles:

  1. Technology-agnostic service definition
  2. Unified request/response
  3. Consequent contract first
  4. Technology bindings
00_cover_0 If you want to know more, please read my latest article about sustainable service design which has been publised in issue 2.2015 of Javamagazin (German).The interview can be found on the jaxenter site.
In the second part in issue 3.2015 I am showing how to implement a sustainable approach using JEE and JBoss Wildfly.

 

BiPRO takes SOA to the next level!

The advocates of Service Orientation always pointed out that SOA comprises 50% technology and 50% business. At BiPRO this vision becomes true.
BiPRO is a standardization organization for the insurance industry. BiPRO has members from the entire market including well known insurance companies and agents. By standardizing services at the business level using proven technical standards, BiPRO really takes the SOA idea to the next level. BiPRO conformant services are reusable and highly interoperable. Development is contract first, based on open standards such as WSDL and XSD. It is really impressive to see what BiPRO already achieved.

On 25.6.-26.6. June BiPRO-Day 2014 is going to take place in Düsseldorf Germany.

BiPRO-Tag2014_Signet_col

At the event I am going to give a live coding session. In particular I am going to show how to implement and secure BiPRO services using current Web Service standards such as JAX-WS, SAML, WS-Security and WS-SecureConversation. Attendees can see how the implementation works with JBoss Wildfly, Apache CXF and .NET. Moreover they can take a peek into the future of BiPRO standards in the area of security.
I hope to see you there!

Capacity Based Velocity Calculation for Dynamic Agile Teams

Traditionally the velocity (V) of agile teams is calculated as number of story points (SP) delivered per sprint. If our team is static, that means, it consists of the same or at least the same amount of people in each sprint we can get a velocity that really reflects the team performance.
Although highly desireable, from my experience static teams are not very common. In fact most teams have a certain degree of dynamics, especially in long running projects.

Typical reasons are

  • Vacation or sick leave
  • Daily business (especially team members from the business are not 100% commited to the project, as they still have their daily duties)
  • Partial engagement (specialists are only part of the team when their knowledge is required)

How can we calculate the velocity for those dynamic teams? By taking capacity into account and combining it with the team velocity. I can recommend following procedure that I used on several projects with very good results.

  1. Have a sprint planning meeting with all people that might have something to deliver in the next sprint or delivered something in the previous sprint.
  2. Ask every person how much days she plans to commit to the next sprint. This is the planned capacity (PC). Adjust PC if necessary during the sprint planning session based on the selected user stories. Use PC as a basis to plan the next sprint.
  3. Ask every person how much days she really committed to the previous sprint. This is the delivered capacity (DC). The delivered capacity might differ from the planned capacity announced in the previous sprint planning metting. That is normal for the reasons given above.
  4. Calculate the capacity based velocity like this CBV = SP/DC.

The advantages of capacity based velocity are:

  1. It is based on empiric data (delivered capacity instead of planned capacity). It reflects what really happened and not what was supposed to happen.
  2. It grounds story points (virtual) with capacity (real) as it takes capacity into account in addition to the story points. But beware! Once the SP/DC ratio (how many days do we need to implement a story point?) is known after some sprints, it is tempting to perform planning with capacity instead of story points. This is a bad idea as it brings us back to the notion of exact planning which we (hopefully) learned is not possible.
  3. It allows the projection of realistic project release dates as we have a stable measure even if the team structure varies.

 

Understand your Team with SCARF

If you are a Scrum Master or coach you might sometimes wonder why people act and react the way they do.
The SCARF model can help you to understand which factors are driving peoples reactions.
The model lists factors that cause a reaction of either approach or avoid. The factors are:

Status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness and fairness

Here are some ideas what you can do to minimize reactions of avoidance in your Scrum team:

  1. Increase status by praising sprint results as well as team improvements, ideally in public.
  2. Increase certainty by protecting the sprint from outside disturbances. Make sure the expectations are stable and understood.
  3. Increase autonomy by letting the team take decisions.
  4. Increase relationship by colocating the team members. Select team members by personal interests as well as technical expertise.
  5. Increase fairness by treating yourself and the team members equally.

Keeping those factors in mind can help to better understand peoples reactions and adapt your own behavior so that it minimizes reactions of avoidance.

Team Complexity – The Underestimated Factor

Most people would agree to say that an IT project is complex if it has to cope with difficult technology and a challenging business context.
But it is not just technical complexity that threatens the success of a project. Team complexity is an important and often underestimated factor that highly affects the likelyness of success and failure of IT projects.
Even if you have a simple technical problem to solve, it can get much more complicated if you do it with a complex team.
The main problem is that effective communication is very hard to achieve with complex teams. But effective communication amongst the stakeholders, developers, business and operations is one of the key success factors for IT projects. Thus having a team with low complexity reduces risk and increases efficiency. But why is this often not recognized? I think the reason is that dynamic effects are hard to measure and invisible most of the time.
Inspired by the article Projects fail due to dynamic complexity (German) written by Prof. Dr. des. oec. HSG Stefan Grösser I thought about common factors that affect team complexity and therefore dynamic complexity.
To create more awareness in terms of those factors and make the subject more tangible I’ve created the Team Complexity Calculator. Its a fun tool that can be used to get a better idea of how those typical factors affect team complexity. It does not produce absolute results, so please don’t take it too serious. 😉
If you know additional factors that affect team complexity, please let me know.

Those factors are based on experience I’ve made in projects ranging from small to very large sizes.

How to Link WSDL-Services To BPMN-Processes

Since BPMN2.0 it is not only possible to design processes but to also execute them using a process engine. The process flow has a appropriate visual representation in the standard. But executable processes are mostly data driven. They interact with external services and exchange data with them. In addition to that processes maintain their own internal state. So a common requirement is to model the process internal state and connect to external services using the service data representation. BPMN is capable to include data definitions based on WSDL and XML Schemas, although the capabilities of the tools (that I know) to visualize data are somewhat limited.

In this blogpost I would like to show you how data looks like in BPMN and how a process can be linked in a standardized way to existing services based on WSDL and XSD.

The process is as simple as possible. The service is based on a BiPRO service description. The BiPRO is a standardization organisation in the German insurance market that standardizes processes and services at a technical and business level.

WSDLtoBPMN

Below you see a simplyfied version in plain BPMN (when you import the bpmn below you will only see the events and tasks).


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<definitions id="definitions" xmlns="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL"
  xmlns:bpmn="http://schema.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0"
  xmlns:bpmndi="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/DI"  
  xmlns:dc="http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/20100524/DC"
  xmlns:di="http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/20100524/DI"  
  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
  targetNamespace="http://www.pleus.net/example"
  xmlns:tns="http://www.pleus.net/example"
  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  
  xmlns:nachrichten="http://www.bipro.net/namespace/nachrichten"
  xmlns:bipro="http://www.bipro.net/namespace"
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL http://bpmn.sourceforge.net/schemas/BPMN20.xsd">
  
  <!-- WSDL Import -->
  <import importType="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
          location="KompsitService_2.4.3.1.1.wsdl"
          namespace="http://www.bipro.net/namespace" />

   <!-- Item definition. Link to the external WSDL/XSD structure. structureRef: QName of input element -->
   <itemDefinition id="getQuoteRequestItem" structureRef="nachrichten:getQuote" />
   <itemDefinition id="getQuoteResponseItem" structureRef="nachrichten:getQuoteResponse" />

   <!-- Message definitions. Link to the item definition. Can be visualized by using DI -->
   <message id="getQuoteRequestMessage" itemRef="tns:getQuoteRequestItem" />
   <message id="getQuoteResponseMessage" itemRef="tns:getQuoteResponseItem" />

   <!-- Interface definition. implementationRef = QName of WSDL Port Type -->
   <interface name="Komposit Interface" implementationRef="bipro:KompositServicePortType">
      <!-- Operation: implementationRef = QName of WSDL Operation -->
      <operation id="getQuoteOperation" name="getQuote Operation" implementationRef="bipro:getQuote">
         <!-- Links to the message definitions --> 
         <inMessageRef>tns:getQuoteRequestMessage</inMessageRef>
         <outMessageRef>tns:getQuoteResponseMessage</outMessageRef>
      </operation>
   </interface>
 
  <process id="servicecall">
 
   <!-- Datasources and targets for the service call (process state). Can be visualized by using DI and dataObjectReferences -->
   <dataObject id="dataInputOfProcess" name="Input for webservice" itemSubjectRef="xs:string"/>
   <dataObject id="dataOutputOfProcess" name="Output for webservice" itemSubjectRef="xs:string"/>
  
   <!-- Process start -->
   <startEvent id="start" />
 
   <sequenceFlow id="flow1" sourceRef="start" targetRef="initScript" />
 
   <!-- Initialization of process data -->
   <scriptTask id="initScript" scriptFormat="groovy" name="Initialize process">
     <script>
       def temp = "2.4.3.1.1"
       execution.setVariable("dataInputOfProcess", temp)
     </script>
   </scriptTask>
 
   <sequenceFlow id="flow2" sourceRef="initScript" targetRef="webService" />
 
   <!-- Web Service call -->
   <serviceTask id="webService" name="Call getQuote" implementation="##WebService" operationRef="tns:getQuoteOperation">
       
       <!-- Defines the inputs and outputs and links to item definitions -->
       <ioSpecification>
          <dataInput itemSubjectRef="tns:getQuoteRequestItem" id="dataInputOfServiceTask" />
          <dataOutput itemSubjectRef="tns:getQuoteResponseItem" id="dataOutputOfServiceTask" />
          <inputSet>
             <dataInputRefs>dataInputOfServiceTask</dataInputRefs>
          </inputSet>
          <outputSet>
             <dataOutputRefs>dataOutputOfServiceTask</dataOutputRefs>
          </outputSet>
       </ioSpecification>
       
       <!-- Defines the mapping between process data and service input -->
       <dataInputAssociation>
          <sourceRef>dataInputOfProcess</sourceRef>
          <targetRef>dataInputOfServiceTask</targetRef>
          <assignment>
            <from>
             bpmn:getDataObject('dataInputOfProcess')
            </from>
            <to>
             bpmn:getDataInput('dataInputOfServiceTask')/BiPROVersion/
            </to>
          </assignment>
       </dataInputAssociation>

       <!-- Defines the mapping between process data and service output -->
       <dataOutputAssociation>
          <sourceRef>dataOutputOfServiceTask</sourceRef>
          <targetRef>dataOutputOfProcess</targetRef>
          <assignment>
            <from>
             bpmn:getDataOutput('dataOutputOfServiceTask')/BiPROVersion/
            </from>
            <to>
             bpmn:getDataObject('dataOutputOfProcess')
            </to>
          </assignment>
       </dataOutputAssociation>

   </serviceTask>
 
   <sequenceFlow id="flow3" sourceRef="webService" targetRef="end" />
   
   <!-- Process end -->
   <endEvent id="end" />
 
  </process>

Now let’s look at the example step-by-step.

1. Import the service: Line 16-18 imports the WSDL file that includes the types and messages used by the external service that we want to call from the process.

2. Define the items: Line 21-22 defines items that act as links to the types defined in the imported WSDL and XSD files.

3. Define the messages: Line 25-26 defines messages to be used in the interface definition that we see in the next step. Messages can be visualized by modeling tools provided that DI Information is present in the model.

4. Define the interface: The interface is the equivalent to the WSDL port type in BPMN. It is defined in line 29-36. So far we have itemDefinitions that link to the XSD-messages and an interface that links to the WSDL-port type. The inMessageRef and outMessageRef elements use the messages defined in step 3 to indirectly reference the itemDefinitions.

5. Define the process variables: The process maintains state. This state is defined in the form of dataObjects in line 41-42. Please note that the links to the external service are defined outside the process (which begins in line 38). The dataObjects are defined inside the process as they represent the data that is maintained by the respective process instances. By the way, when importing the process in a modeling tool, dataObjects are not visualized. To visualize dataObjects as a paper sheet, dataObjectReferences can be used. In this simple example we just use a string as input and output which transports a version information send to the BiPRO service and back. In a more complex senario this could be a type from an imported XSD.

6. Initialize the process: A simple BPMN script task (line 50-55) is used to initialize the dataObject dataInputOfProcess. It just sets the version to 2.4.3.1.1.

7. Link the serviceTask: The most complex part is the serviceTask (line 60-102). The operationRef attribute (line 60) links to the operation which is part of the interface definition (line 31). This is the web service operation to be called when the serviceTask is executed. The serviceTask comprises the elements ioSpecification (line 63-72), dataInputAssociation(line 75-86) and dataOutputAssociation (line 89-100). ioSpecification can be seen as a logical port that describes the service input and output from the perspective of the service. The itemSubjectRef attribute on the dataInput and dataOutput elements (line 64-65) link to the itemDefinitions (line 21-22) and as such to the data structures in the WSDL files. The id together with the inputSet and outputSet (line 66-71) define the connection points the serviceTask offers for sending and receiving data. dataInputAssociation and dataOutputAssociation map the dataObjects (process data) to the connection points or in other words to the request and response structures of the service (service data).

When the serviceTask webService is called, the process data from the dataObject dataInputOfProcess is copied to the web service request message nachrichten:getQuote/BIPROVersion. Then the service is called. After the service call finished, the version is copied from the response message nachrichten:getQuoteResponse/BIPROVersion to the dataObject dataOutputOfProcess.

This blogpost has shown how to link WSDL/XSD based services to BPMN processes in a standardized way.
Even if automated process execution is not in focus, it can be important to unambiguously link services to processes to create an integrated view of the entire process including its data.